3
Vote

Updating a value in the source DB doesn't get synced to Outlook

description

The vti_versionhistory value needs to be incremented. Currently this functionality is not implemented, but is a Pri-1 issue.

comments

pcreehan wrote Sep 8, 2008 at 7:06 PM

I'm open to ideas on this. Here some ideas I have:
  1. Rely on the provider to do this. I don't necessarily like this option because the idea was that the provider just deals with data they know about and doesn't have to worry about things like vti_versionhistory updates.
  2. Update the versionhistory when Outlook does an update (that way it's already updated next time). The problem with this is that if there ARE no updates and Outlook requests updates, it will get this one.
  3. Update it when the provider returns it in a getupdates call. Again, i'd have to update the item inside the getitems call which will skew the modify time info.
  4. Store this information myself and just return it on updates.

wrote May 15, 2009 at 8:26 PM

tfsjohan wrote May 15, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Have you found any solution to this yet? I'd really like som help with this.

wrote May 17, 2010 at 8:52 AM

wrote Feb 13, 2013 at 11:12 PM